I can confirm it was the reason for some ISOs to not boot (ChimeraOS, Manjaro Gnome). Ventoy is supporting almost all of Arch-based Distros well. I'm getting the same error when booting "Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-33-1.2.iso" or "pop-os_20.04_amd64_intel_8.iso" on either a new ThinkPad X13 or T14s using Ventoy 1.0.31 UEFI. Fedora-Security-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20200526.n.0 - 1.95 GB, guix-system-install-1.1.0.x86_64-linux.iso - 550 MB, ipfire-2.25.x86_64-full-core143.iso - 280 MB, SpringdaleLinux-8.1-x86_64-netinst.iso - 580 MB, Acronis.True.Image.2020.v24.6.1.25700.Boot.CD.iso - 690 MB, O-O.BlueCon.Admin.17.0.7024.WinPE.iso - 480 MB, adelie-live-x86_64-1.0-rc1-20200202.iso - 140 MB, fhclive-USB-2019.02_kernel-4.4.178_amd64.iso - 450 MB, MiniTool.Partition.Wizard.Technician.WinPE.11.5.iso - 390 MB, AOMEI.Backupper.Technician.Plus.5.6.0_UEFI.iso - 380 MB, O-O.DiskImage.Professional.14.0.321.WinPE.iso - 380 MB, EaseUS.Data.Recovery.Wizard.WinPE.13.2.iso - 390 MB, Active.Boot.Disk.15.0.6.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Active.Data.Studio.15.0.0.Boot.Disk.x64.iso - 550 MB, EASEUS.Partition.Master.13.5.Technician.Edition.WinPE.x64.iso - 500 MB, Macrium_Reflect_Workstation_PE_v7.2.4797.iso - 280 MB, Paragon.Hard.Disk.Manager.Advanced.17.13.1.x64.WinPE.iso - 400 MB, Passware.Kit.Forensic.2017.1.1.Win.10-64bit.BootCD.iso - 350 MB, orel-2.12.22-26.12.2019_13.14.livecd.iso - 1.1 GB, rocksolid-signage-release-installer-1.13.4-1.iso - 1.3 GB, manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso - 3 GB, OpenStage-2020.03-xfce4-x86_64.iso - 1.70 GB, resilientlinux-installer-amd64-2.2.iso - 2.20 GB, virage-beowulf-3.0-x86-64-UEFI-20191110_1146.iso - 1.30 GB, BlackWeb-Unleashed.19.11-amd64.hybrid.iso - 3 GB, yunohost-stretch-3.6.4.6-amd64-stable.iso - 400 MB, OpenMandrivaLx.4.2-snapshot-plasma.x86_64.iso - 2.10 GB Select "Partition scheme" as MBR (Master Boot Record) and "File system" as NTFS. ? If a user is booting a lot of unsigned bootloaders with Secure Boot enabled, they clearly should disable Secure Boot in their settings, because, for what they are doing, it is pretty much pointless. Besides, I'm considering that: privacy statement. Some modern systems are not compatible with Windows 7 UEFI64 (may hang) Thanks very much for proposing this great OS , tested and added to report. Please follow About file checksum to checksum the file. same here on ThinkPad x13 as for @rderooy Did you test using real system and UEFI64 boot? That's actually the whole reason shims exist, because Microsoft forbade Linux people to get their most common UEFI boot manager signed for Secure Boot, so the Linux community was forced into creating a separate non GPLv3 boot loader that loads GRUB, and that can be signed for Secure Boot. So, Fedora has shim that loads only Fedoras files. This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. Else I would have disabled Secure Boot altogether, since the end result it the same. Vmware) with UEFI mode and to confirm that the ISO file does support UEFI mode. Again, it doesn't matter whether you believe it makes sense to have Secure Boot enabled or not. Also tested on Lenovo IdeaPad 300 16GB OK (UEFI64). 2There are two methods: Enroll Key and Enroll Hash, use whichever one. Another issue about Porteus and Aporteus : if we copy ISO via dd or other tools or copy ISO contents to EFI partition of USB work perfectly in UEFI. en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_updated_may_2020_x64_dvd_aa8db2cc.iso Just like what is the case with Ventoy, I don't have much of an issue with having some leeway, on account that implementing proper signature validation requires some effort, during which unsigned bootloaders may be accepted, so as not inconvenience users too much. I can 3 options and option 3 is the default. Secure Boot is supported since Ventoy-1.0.07, please use the latest version and see the Notes. Guiding you with how-to advice, news and tips to upgrade your tech life. Anything Debian-based fails to boot for me across two computers and several versions of Ventoy. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view, https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file, [issue]: Can't boot Ventoy UEFI Native (Without CSM) on HP ProBook 640g1. I have the same error, I can boot from the same usb, the same iso file and the same Ventoy on asus vivobook but not on asus ROG. Just some preliminary ideas. Preventing malicious programs is not the task of secure boot. Can it boot ok? Discovery and usage of shim protocol of loaded shim binary for global UEFI validation functions (validation policy override with shim verification), Shim protocol unregistration of loaded shim binary (to prevent confusion among shims of multiple vendors and registration of multiple protocols which are handled by different chainloaded shims). regular-cinnamon-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.1 GB, openSUSE-Tumbleweed-GNOME-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 852MB WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso BOOT but Custom launcher cannot open custom path and unable access to special apps. I didn't add an efi boot file - it already existed; I only referenced By default, the ISO partition can not be mounted after boot Linux (will show device busy when you mount). It was actually quite the struggle to get to that stage (expensive too!) unsigned kernel still can not be booted. Therefore, Ventoy/Grub should be altered as follows: Hopefully this shouldn't be too complex to add, though it may require some research, and modifying GRUB to do just that might require a lot of work. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added some ISO's files : You can change the type or just delete the partition. If you allow someone physical access to your Secure Boot-enabled system, and you have not disabled USB booting in the BIOS (or booting from CD\DVD), then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. For secure boot please refer Secure Boot . And IMO, anything that attempts to push the idea that, maybe, allowing silent boot of unsigned bootloaders is not that bad, is actually doing a major disservice to users, as it does weaken the security of their system and, if this is really what a user wants, they can and should disable Secure Boot. But it shouldn't be to the user to do that. The main issue is that users should at least get some warning that a bootloader failed SB validation when SB is enabled, instead of just letting everything go through. always used Archive Manager to do this and have never had an issue. I tested it but trying to boot it will fail with an I/O error. Option1: Use current solution(Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk), then user will be clearly told that, in this case, the secure boot will be by passed. then there is no point in implementing a USB-based Secure Boot loader. Topics in this forum are automatically closed 6 months after creation. to be used in Super GRUB2 Disk. They boot from Ventoy just fine. Link: https://www.mediafire.com/file/5zui8pq5p0p9zug/Windows10_SuperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso/file It's a bug I introduced with Rescuezilla v2.4. For these who select to bypass secure boot. Just some of my thoughts: privacy statement. I assume that file-roller is not preserving boot parameters, use another iso creation tool. Try updating it and see if that fixes the issue. @ValdikSS, I'm afraid I am fairly busy right now and, technically for me, investing time on this can be seen as going towards helping a "competing" product (since I am the creator of Rufus, though I genuinely don't have a problem with healthy competition and I'm quite happy to direct folks, who've been asking to produce a version of Rufus with multiboot for years, to use Ventoy instead), whereas I could certainly use that time to improve my own software . Ventoy is able to chain boot Windows 10 (build 2004) just fine on the same systems. Thanks! , ctrl+alt+del . This filesystem offers better compatibility with Window OS, macOS, and Linux. Open File Explorer and head to the directory where you keep your boot images. ventoy_x64.efi/ventoy_util_x64.efi ) , they do need digital signatures. Yes. No! 2. . due to UEFI setup password in a corporate laptop which the user don't know. Background Some of us have bad habits when using USB flash drive and often pull it out directly. The BIOS decides to boot Ventoy in Legacy BIOS mode or in UEFI mode. Unsigned bootloader Linux ISOs or ISOs without UEFI support does not boot with Secure Boot enabled. my pleasure and gladly happen :) openSUSE-Tumbleweed-KDE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 952MB Hello , Thank you very very much for your testings and reports. size 5580453888 bytes (5,58 GB) ", https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view privacy statement. Format UDF in Windows: format x: /fs:udf /q Have a question about this project? Back Button - owsnyr.lesthetiquecusago.it You need to create a directory with name ventoy and put ventoy.json in this directory(that is \ventoy\ventoy.json). I've made some tests this evening, it should be possible to make more-or-less proper Secure Boot support in Ventoy, but that would require modification of grub code to use shim protocol, and digital signatures for all Ventoy efi files, modules, etc. You were able to use TPM for disk encryption long before Secure Boot, and rightfully so, since the process of storing and using data encryption keys is completely different from the process of storing and using trust chain keys to validate binary executables (being able to decrypt something is very different from being able to trust something). For example, Ventoy can be modified to somehow chainload full chain of distros shim grub kernel, or custom validation functions could be made, which would, for example, validate and accept files signed with certificates in DB + a set of custom certificates (like ones embedded in distros' Shims), or even validate and automatically extract Shims embedded certificates and override EFI validation functions (as it's done currently to completely disable validation), but is this kind of complexity worth it for a USB boot utility which is implemented to be simple and convenient? 1. Ventoy About File Checksum 1. It is designed to protect a system against malicious code being loaded and executed early in the boot process, before the operating system has been loaded. And that is the right thing to do. Some Legacy BIOS has an access limitation and wont read a disk that exceeds the limitation. This means current is ARM64 UEFI mode. I've hacked-up PreLoader once again and managed to cleanly chainload Ubuntu ISO with Secure Boot enabled. Well occasionally send you account related emails. When user check the Secure boot support option then only run .efi file with valid signature is select. Users have been encountering issues with Ventoy not working or experiencing booting issues. How to Fix No bootfile found for UEFI on a Laptop or Desktop PC - YouTube A Multiboot Linux USB for PC Repair | Page 135 - GBAtemp.net If that was the case, I would most likely sign Ventoy for my SHIM (provided it doesn't let through unsigned bootloaders when Secure Boot is enabled, which is the precise issue we are trying to solve) since, even if it's supposed to be a competitor of Rufus, I think it's a very nice solution and I'm always more than happy to direct people who would like to have a multiboot version of Rufus to use Ventoy instead. For these who select to bypass secure boot. Do NOT put the file to the 32MB VTOYEFI partition. Option 1: doesn't support secure boot at all Edit: Disabling Secure Boot didn't help. When user whitelist Venoy that means they trust Ventoy (e.g. The user has Ubuntu, Fedora and OpenSUSE ISOs which they want to load. We talk about secure boot, not secure system. However, after adding firmware packages Ventoy complains Bootfile not found. I'll fix it. Option2: Use Ventoy's grub which is signed with MS key. Once here, scroll down and move to the "Download Windows 11 Disk Image (ISO) for x64 devices" section. Then Ventoy will load without issue if the secure boot is enabled in the BIOS. But even the user answer "YES, I don't care, just boot it." The boot.wim mode appears to be over 500MB. Ventoy Version 1.0.78 What about latest release Yes. Some known process are as follows: They all work if I put them onto flash drives directly with Rufus. Hey, I have encountered the same problem and I found that after deleting the "System Volume Information" folder on Ventoy partition of the USB disk, it can boot now. Insert a USB flash drive with at least 8 GB of storage capacity into your computer. If the ISO is on the tested list, then clearly it is a problem with your particular equipment, so you need to give the details. Have a question about this project? The file formats that Ventoy supports include ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files. From the booted OS, they are then free to do whatever they want to the system. It looks cool. 1.0.80 actually prompts you every time, so that's how I found it. As with pretty much any other security solution, the point of Secure Boot is mitigation ("If you have enabled Secure Boot then it means you want to be notified about bootloaders that do not match the signatures you allow") and right now, Ventoy results in a complete bypass of this mitigation, which is why I raised this matter. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and Thank you I have tried the latest release, but the bug still exist. Which brings us nicely to what this is all about: Mitigation. debes activar modo uefi en el bios MD5: f424a52153e6e5ed4c0d44235cf545d5 Ventoy 1.0.55 is available already for download. @pbatard So if the ISO doesn't support UEFI mode itself, the boot will fail. No. FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE Aarch64 fails to boot saying "No bootfile found for UEFI!". @ventoy used Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk files to disable UEFI file policy, that's the easiest way, but not a 'proper' one. What system are you booting from? yes, but i try with rufus, yumi, winsetuptousb, its okay. Help !!!!!!! And of course, people expect that if they run UEFIinSecureBoot or similar software, whose goal is explicitly stated as such, it will effectively remove Secure Boot. Copyright Windows Report 2023. Ventoy can boot any wim file and inject any user code into it. Hi, Hiren's Boot CD can be booted by Ventoy in Memdisk mode, you try Ventoy 1.0.08 beta2. all give ERROR on HP Laptop : @MFlisar Hiren's Boot CD was down with UEFI (legacy still has some problem), manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso BOOT Ventoy's boot menu is not shown but with the following grub shell. Ventoy - Open source USB boot utility for both BIOS and UEFI ubuntu-20.10-desktop-amd64.iso everything is fine If instead I try to install the ISO ubuntu-22.04.1-desktop-amd64.iso I get the following error message: "No bootfile found for UEFI! @BxOxSxS Please test these ISO files in Virtual Machine (e.g. Only in 2019 the signature validation was enforced. So from ventoy 1.0.09, an option for secure boot is added in Ventoy2Disk.exe/Ventoy2Disk.sh and default is disabled. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. Could you please also try via BIOS/Legacy mode? For example, how to get Ventoy's grub signed with MS key. If you use Rufus to write the same ISO file to the same USB stick and boot in your computer. https://osdn.net/projects/manjaro/storage/kde/, https://abf.openmandriva.org/platforms/cooker/products/4/product_build_lists/3250, https://abf.openmandriva.org/product_build_lists, chromeos_14816.99.0_reven_recovery_stable-channel_mp-v2.bin, https://github.com/rescuezilla/rescuezilla/releases/download/2.4/rescuezilla-2.4-64bit.jammy.iso, https://nyancat.fandom.com/wiki/MEMZ_Nyan_Cat, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mv6Cbew_y8&t=1m13s, https://mega.nz/folder/TI8ECBKY#i89YUsA0rCJp9kTClz3VlA. Thnx again. This was not considered Secure Boot violation as ExitBootServices() was called prior to booting the kernel. The same applies to OS/2, eComStation etc. Does it work on these machines (real or emulated) by booting it from a CDR / .iso image? BIOS Mode Both Partition Style GPT Disk . Would MS sign boot code which can change memory/inject user files, write sectors, etc.? fails to find system in /slax, 'Hello System' os can boot successfully with bootx64.efi's machine and show desktop. Also, what GRUB theme are you using? How to Download Windows 11 ISO and Perform a Clean Install | Beebom Ventoy -Bootable USB [No-Root] - Apps on Google Play - Android Apps on Both are good. This means current is Legacy BIOS mode. SB works using cryptographic checksums and signatures. Again, detecting malicious bootloaders, from any media, is not a bonus. This iso seems to have some problem with UEFI. (The 32 bit images have got the 32 bit UEFI). You can grab latest ISO files here : Go to This PC in the File Explorer, then open the drive where you installed Ventoy. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. If Ventoy was intended to be used from an internal hard disk, I would agree with you, but Ventoy is a USB-based multiboot solution and therefore the user must have physical access to the system, so it is the users responsibility to be careful about what he inserts into that USB port. If you have a faulty USB stick, then youre likely to encounter booting issues. Open Rufus and select the USB flash drive under "Device" and select Extended Windows 11 Installation under Image option. Then the process of reading your "TPM-secured" disk becomes as easy as: User awareness that their encrypted data was read: Nil. So even when someone physically unplugs my SSD and installs a malicious bootloader/OS to it, it won't be able to decrypt the main OS partition. Newbie. So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. In Windows, some processes will occupy the USB drive, and Ventoy2Disk.exe cannot obtain the control right of the USB drive, so that the device cannot be listed. How to suppress iso files under specific directory . Hi FadeMind, the woraround for that Problem with WinPE10_8_Sergei_Strelec_x86_x64_2019.12.28_English.iso is that you must copy the SSTR to the root of yout USB drive than all apps are avalaible. Now Rufus has achieved support for secure boot as now NTFS:UEFI Driver is signed for secure boot by Microsoft. Thanks. and reboot.pro.. and to tinybit specially :) You answer my questions and then I will answer yours MEMZ.img was listed with no changes for me. Any progress towards proper secure boot support without using mokmanager? ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefidibujo del sistema nervioso y sus partes para nios ventoy maybe the image does not support x64 uefi. Turned out archlinux-2021.06.01-x86_64 is not compatible. Forum rules Before you post please read how to get help. "+String(e)+r);return new Intl.NumberFormat('en-US').format(Math.round(569086*a+n))}var rng=document.querySelector("#restoro-downloads");rng.innerHTML=gennr();rng.removeAttribute("id");var restoroDownloadLink=document.querySelector("#restoro-download-link"),restoroDownloadArrow=document.querySelector(".restoro-download-arrow"),restoroCloseArrow=document.querySelector("#close-restoro-download-arrow");if(window.navigator.vendor=="Google Inc."){restoroDownloadLink.addEventListener("click",function(){setTimeout(function(){restoroDownloadArrow.style.display="flex"},500),restoroCloseArrow.addEventListener("click",function(){restoroDownloadArrow.style.display="none"})});}. Ventoy Binary Notes: This website is underprovisioned, so please download ventoy in the follows: (remember to check the SHA-256 hash) https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases Source Code Ventoy's source code is maintained on both Github and Gitee. There are many other applications that can create bootable disks but Ventoy comes with its sets of features. I'll think about it and try to add it to ventoy. Can't install Windows 7 ISO, no install media found ? Tested on 1.0.57 and 1.0.79. Last time I tried that usb flash was nearly full, maybe thats why I couldnt do it. and select the efisys.bin from desktop and save the .iso Now the Minitool.iso should boot into UEFI with Ventoy. Aporteus which is Arch Linux based version of Porteus , is best , fastest and greatest distro i ever met , it's fully modular , supports bleeding edge techs like zstd , have a tool to very easily compile and use latest version of released or RC kernel directly from kernel.org ( Kernel Builder ) , have a tool to generate daily fresh ISO so all the packages are daily and fresh ( Aporteus ISO Builder ) , you can have multi desktops on a ISO and on boot select whatever you like , it has naturally Copy to RAM feature with flag to copy specific modules only so linux run at huge speed , a lot of tools and softwares along side mini size ISO , and it use very very low ram and ISO size, You can generate ISO with whatever language you like to distro have. Tested below ISOs on HP ENVY x360- 13-ag0007au (1st-gen Ryzen Mobile convertible laptop, BIOS F.46 Rev.A) with Ventoy 1.0.08 final release in UEFI secure boot mode: Nice job and thanks a lot for this neat tool! Do I need a custom shim protocol? Thank you! I installed ventoy-1.0.32 and replace the .efi files. By clicking Sign up for GitHub, you agree to our terms of service and For me I'm missing Hiren's Boot CD (https://www.hirensbootcd.org/) - it's WindowsPE based and supports UEFI from USB. Again, the major problem I see with this fine discussion is that everybody appears to be tiptoeing around the fact that some users have no clue what Secure Boot is intended for (only that, because it says "Secure" they don't want to turn it off), and, rather than trying to educate them about that, we're trying to find ways to keep them "feeling safe" when the choices they might make would leave their system anything but. size: 589 (617756672 byte) Must hardreset the System. 1.- comprobar que la imagen que tienes sea de 64 bits If everything is fine, I'll prepare the repo, prettify the code and write detailed compilation and usage instructions, as well as help @ventoy with integration. Follow the guide below to quickly find a solution. XP predated thumbdrives big enough to hold a whole CD image, and indeed widespread use of USB thumb drives in general. I have absolutely no problem with letting the user choose if they want to run a bootloader that failed Secure Boot validation, and I think this might be the better way to do it indeed. Will polish and publish the code later. md5sum 6b6daf649ca44fadbd7081fa0f2f9177 It does not contain efi boot files. Don't get me wrong, I understand your concerns and support your position. This means current is UEFI mode. Let us know in the comments which solution worked for you. Legacy\UEFI32\UEFI64 boot? You can't. Minor one: when you try to start unsigned .efi executable, error message is shown for a very brief time and quickly disappears. 4. Yes, at this point you have the same exact image as I have. Windows 7 UEFI64 Install - Easy2Boot Already on GitHub? The virtual machine cannot boot. all give ERROR on my PC No bootfile found for UEFI, maybe the image doesnt support ia32 uefi error, asus t100ta Kinda solved: Cant install arch, but can install linux mint 64 bit. As Ventoy itself is not signed with Microsoft key, it uses Shim from Fedora (or, more precisely, from Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk). So that means that Ventoy will need to use a different key indeed. I have used OSFMount to convert the img file of memtest v8 to iso but I have encountered the same issue. sol-11_3-live-x86.iso | 1.22 GB, gnewsense-live-4.0-amd64-gnome.iso | 1.10 GB, hyperbola-milky-way-v0.3.1-dual.iso | 680 MB, kibojoe-17.09final-stable-x86_64-code21217.iso | 950 MB, uruk-gnu-linux-3.0-2020-6-alpha-1.iso | 1.35 GB, Redcore.Linux.Hardened.2004.KDE.amd64.iso | 3.5 GB, Drauger_OS-7.5.1-beta2-AMD64.iso | 1.8 GB, MagpieOS-Gnome-2.4-Eva-2018.10.01-x86_64.iso | 2.3 GB, kaisenlinuxrolling1.0-amd64.iso | 2.80 GB, chakra-2019.09.26-a022cb57-x86_64.iso | 2.7 GB, Regata_OS_19.1_en-US.x86_64-19.1.50.iso | 2.4 GB. I was just objecting to your claim that Secure Boot is useless when someone has physical access to the device, which I don't think is true, as it is still (afaik) required for TPM-based encryption to work correctly. It should be specially noted that, no matter USB drive or local disk, all the data will be lost after install Ventoy, please be very careful. Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate. Nevertheless, thanks for the explanation, it cleared up some things for me around the threat model of Secure Boot. But, UEFI:NTFS is not a SHIM and that's actually the reason why it could be signed by Microsoft (once I switched the bootloader license from GPLv3+ to GPLv2+ and rewrote a UEFI driver derived from GPLv2+ code, which I am definitely not happy at all about), because, in a Secure Boot enabled environment, it can not be used to chain load anything that isn't itself Secure Boot signed. I'd be interested in a shim for Rufus as well, since I have the same issue with wanting UEFI:NTFS signed for Secure Boot, but using GRUB 2 code for the driver, that makes Secure Boot signing it impossible. Then your life is simplified to Persistence management while each of the 2 (Ventoy or SG2D) provide the ability to boot Windows if it is installed on any local . If you want you can toggle Show all devices option, then all the devices will be in the list. However the solution is not perfect enough. https://download.freebsd.org/releases/arm64/aarch64/ISO-IMAGES/13.1/FreeBSD-13.1-RELEASE-arm64-aarch64-disc1.iso. In WIMBOOT mode (ctrl+w) I get 'Loading files. xx%' and then screen resolution changes and get nice Windows Setup GUI. 2. ventoy.json should be placed at the 1st partition which has the larger capacity (The partition to store ISO files). Error : @FadeMind Most likely it was caused by the lack of USB 3.0 driver in the ISO. About Secure Boot in UEFI mode - Ventoy By the way, since I do want to bring that message home for people who might be tempted to place a bit too much trust in TPMs, disk encryption and Secure Boot, what the NSA would most likely do, if they wanted to access your encrypted disk data on an x86 PC, is issue a secret executive order to Intel or AMD, to design special version of the CPU they need, where the serial can be altered programmatically (so that they can clone the serial from the original CPU in case the TPM checks it) and that includes additional logic and EPROM to detect and store the critical data (such as disk decryption keys) when accessed. The file size will be over 5 GB. @ValdikSS, I'm not seeing much being debated, when the link you point to appears to indicate that pretty much everybody is in agreement that loading unsigned kernels from GRUB, in a Secure Boot environment, is a bug (hence why it was reported as such). @pbatard Sorry, I should have explained my position clearer - I fully agree that the Secure Boot bypass Ventoy uses is not secure, and I'm not using Ventoy exactly because of it. Select the images files you want to back up on the USB drive and copy them. Latest Laptop UEFI 64+SECURE BOOT ON Blocked message. and windows password recovery BootCD How did you get it to be listed by Ventoy? Ventoy can detect GRUB inside ISO file, parse its configuration file and load its boot elements directly, with "linux" GRUB kernel loading command. No idea what's wrong with the sound lol. I have some systems which won't offer legacy boot option if UEFI is present at the same time. Hi, thanks for your repley boot i have same error after menu to start hdclone he's go back to the menu with a black windows saying he's loading the iso file to mem and that it freez. So, this is debatable. Well, that's pretty much exactly what I suggested in points 1-4 from the original post, with point 4 altered from "an error should be returned to the user and bootx64.efi should not be launched" to "an error should be returned to the user who can then decide if they still want to launch bootx64.efi". Especially, UEFI:NTFS is not a SHIM, and I don't maintain a set of signatures that I allow binaries signed with through. Although it could be disabled on all typical motherboards in UEFI setup menu, sometimes it's not easily possible e.g. Just create a FAT32 partition, change its label to ARCH_YYYYMM (fill in the ISO's date, now it would be ARCH_202109) and extract the Arch ISO to it. Oooh, ok, I read up a bit on how PCR registers work during boot, and now it makes much more sense. All the userspace applications don't need to be signed. Installation & Boot. Guid For Ventoy With Secure Boot in UEFI Which is why you want to have as many of these enabled in parallel when they exist (such as TPM + Secure Boot, i.e. E2B and grubfm\agFM legacy mode work OK in their default modes.
Sotto Mare Reservation, Ironman Athlete Tracking, Milford Food Truck Festival 2022, Articles V