Prominent if you go by citations that is. As the Amanda plot zooms here and there, a host of dubious evidence is marshaled to convince us that life is all about mind over matter. [12], Richard Dawkins stated that "the authors seem undecided whether their theme is quantum theory or consciousness. He also has been marketing several products within the school and its followers. asks nothing but . Right after the Velvet Revolution in 1989 (the collapse of the Czechoslovak communism), many new spiritual and other directions were trying to find their ways to the new free countries. you are agreeing to our, One month free trial to theMonitorDaily, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor, Performance of quantum computer no better than ordinary PC, say analysts, 'Spooky' physics: How quantum entanglement could link wormholes, Quantum 'teleportation' distance record broken. The experts start "proving" that humans create their own reality by getting too attached to certain brain chemicals. A moment in which 'the mathematical formalisms of quantum mechanics [] are stripped of all empirical content and reduced to a set of syrupy nostrums'. is released on Friday. "What the Bleep" misses opportunities to focus credibly on the fascinating work people like Newberg have been doing, and makes the science-and-faith field seem like quackery. That's its claim anyway. Mark was born in Johannesburg, South Africa . "Particles appear and disappear where do they go when they're not here? During the Fall of the year Amanda begins to see the world in new and different ways when she begins to question her role in life, her relationships with her career and men and what it all means. The article states that the domestic gross exceeded $10 million, described as not bad for a low-budget documentary, and that the DVD release attained even more significant success with over a million units shipped in the first six months following its release in March 2005. Krauss discussed his criteria ln our interview last week. So what constitutes quantum quackery? With Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, Barry Newman, Armin Shimerman. [16], David Albert, a philosopher of physics who appears in the film, has accused the filmmakers of selectively editing his interview to make it appear that he endorses the film's thesis that quantum mechanics is linked with consciousness. On certain scales, for certain times, in certain regions, everything goes and strange things happen. This is one reason physicists studying a subatomic particle create large numbers of them in particle accelerators. the film What The Bleep Do We Know It was an information that really left me speechless and I ordered his books at once techhose.d-webhost.orphans.co.uk 2 / 11. Within several weeks, the film had appeared in a dozen or more theaters (mostly in the western United States), and within six months it had made its way into 200 theaters across the US. Amit Goswami (PhD) in What the Bleep Do We Know?. [19], According to Margaret Wertheim, "History abounds with religious enthusiasts who have read spiritual portent into the arrangement of the planets, the vacuum of space, electromagnetic waves and the big bang. Particles Popping Into & Out of Existence. Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. Bleep was conceived and its production funded by William Arntz, who co-directed the film along with Betsy Chasse and Mark Vicente; all three were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. According to Joo Magueijo, professor in theoretical physics at Imperial College, the film deliberately misquotes science. It sounds reasonable, and familiar. "[10], What the Bleep Do We Know!? During our current Covid19 pandemic, this collection is highly relevant to a world still seeking novel answers to the human condition and also drawn to old theories long ago debunked. To the blessed memory of all ISHEAGU Indigenes (Anioma) slain by the Nigerian Army on 2ND MAY 1968. Amanda is a divorced woman who makes a living as a photographer. Heisenberg basically says you can't get a really accurate fix on both the position and the momentum of a subatomic particle say an electron at the same time. IE 11 is not supported. Quantum mechanics, the theoretical framework of contemporary physics, is a probability algorithm. The point is, with quantum mechanics, everything doesn't go. People tend to believe that the fact that a certain kind of research is pursued by sizable numbers of people with very good credentials is enough to mean it must be good research. Moreover, assume that they want your money. to someone you know: Down the Rabbit Hole - Quantum Edition multi-disc DVD set was released, containing two extended versions of What the Bleep Do We Know! So far, so good. Dr Candice Pert That would be, very hard to quantify:). What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramthas School of Enlightenment. In the 1970s that abruptly stopped and moved to getting us off this planet. Nasa found something. But whenever one is dealing with highly speculative ideas that have no connection with experiment, theres a danger of becoming delusional and thinking that youre doing real science when youre not. Right now they use a key that's based on the products of large prime numbers, and no computer could determine the prime factors in a time shorter than the age of the universe. and of course the big guy himself, Ramtha. Your subscription to I was expecting something pretty dumb, but am always interested to see what people think about quantum mechanics. The idea that our own perceptions can't be trusted is not new, of course. Now comes the audio edition of the book based on the mind-boggling movie that grossed $11 million in the U.S. alone. Beyond fear, beyond anger. As the discussion moves from science to pop psychology, the film s endorsement of Ramtha s School Of Enlightenment and its simplistic self-improvement mantra becomes clear. The film's central point--that reality is a construct of our own brains--seems rife with intriguing cinematic possibilities. It's there. for only $16.05 $11/page. You dont have a Christian Science Monitor Beliefnet is a lifestyle website providing feature editorial content around the topics of inspiration, spirituality, health, wellness, love and family, news and entertainment. There are also controlled, double-blind prayer studies out there much more interesting than the D.C. crime study cited in the film, though not necessarily more convincing. The plot follows the fictional story of a photographer, using documentary-style interviews and computer-animated graphics, as she encounters emotional and existential obstacles in her life and begins to consider the idea that individual and group consciousness can influence the material world. Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. Hobbs also discusses Hagelin's experiment with Transcendental Meditation and the Washington DC rate of violent crime, saying that "the number of murders actually went up". As the layers to her everyday experiences fall away insertions in the story with scientists, and philosophers and religious leaders . Everyone is still talking about the movie What the Bleep Do We Know!? Hidden Messages In Water Hidden Messages in . Is this a hoax to promote positivity? Interspersed with Amanda's woes and the pseudoscience are random attacks on organized religion. Of Hagelins thousands of citations, how many are from the Ellis/Nanopoulous et al paper mill? What the Bleep Do We Know draws heavily on the role of the observer in quantum physics. But that doesn't mean that astrology is true. Yet, the battle still ranges, and we now know where we can class the distinctions of LQG and String theorists? I think its a good idea for people to consider the example of Hagelin: hes completely delusional and has zero common sense, but able to function at a high level in the particle theory community. But when the ramblings about quantum physics start merging with fridge magnet philosophy, it's time for a little reality checking. presents a viewpoint of the physical universe and human life within it, with connections to neuroscience and quantum physics. What the Bleep Do We Know!? ft. indoor riding arena once used for horse training which was refurbished and floored . A classic experiment on visual processing involves asking people to watch a video of 6 people passing a basketball, and press a button every time a particular team has possession. Q: Obviously, quantum mechanics has lots of real-life applications, including in your television set and your microwave oven. 3. Science Monitor has expired. Those points suggest that quantum-derived "possibilities" affect the wider world, that human thought is the ultimate arbiter of physical reality, and that by manipulating thought properly, people can achieve harmony and even shape the structure of matter. Many religions and spiritual paths--from Hinduism, with its concept of maya, to Christian Science--teach that appearance is illusion. So you forgive the film's jelly-baby graphics, daggy storyline, and that Gabor sister channelling a warrior spirit from Atlantis. Do We (K)now!? The film has a web-site, and there is a long article in Salon explaining that the whole thing is really the production of a cult based in the Pacific Northwest that believes that a woman named JZ Knight is able to channel a 35,000 year old mystic named Ramtha. you refer to the offspring of hep-ph/9803315. That's why we experience a classical world. Even so it notched up $10m in. My FIL is a ex-Air force Pilot. 2. I think of what Niels Bohr said to Wolfgang Pauli about theories that are "not crazy enough to be true." For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. [8], In the Publishers Weekly article, publicist Linda Rienecker of New Page Books says that she sees the success as part of a wider phenomenon, stating "A large part of the population is seeking spiritual connections, and they have the whole world to choose from now". Neither of them convincingly achieve this. It's more like a collision in the editing room between talking heads, an impenetrable human parable and a hallucinogenic animated cartoon. Reality is happening in our brain all the time we're receiving it but it's not being integrated." When you hear the term "quantum consciousness," you should be suspicious. People latch onto their dreams, and they always try to match them to reality. It was one of the most important moments in history. According to an article in Fortean Times by David Hambling, the origins of this story likely involved the voyages of Captain James Cook, not Columbus, and an account related by Robert Hughes which said Cook's ships were "complex and unfamiliar as to defy the natives' understanding". was heavily criticised for being "a documentary aimed at the totally gullible". But it's quite a leap to say the brain doesn't know the difference between vision and memory. No, that wasnt intended specifically as an attack on supersymmetric models; the fact that Hagelin worked on them isnt an argument for or against them. Z. Knight and heavily features commentary from 'Ramtha', an ancient Atlantian general who is apparently speaking through Knight. Evidently Albert claims he was taken advantage of, that his interview was heavily edited to misrepresent his views. [6], The Institute of Noetic Sciences, a New Age research organization that "explores phenomena that do not necessarily fit conventional scientific models", has supported What the Bleep Do We Know!? DVD (2005) Marlee Matlin, Arntz (DIR) cert 12 at the best online prices at eBay! The weirdness of quantum mechanics is reserved for either very specially prepared configurations in the laboratory, or scales that are so small that quantum-mechanical effects are significant. Hope you dont mind me butting in, just thought you might like to see these facts which are so far undisputed about the film. Filmed in Portland, Oregon, What the Bleep Do We Know!? (2005)", "Cult Science Dressing Up Mysticism as Quantum Physics", "The New Age Spiritualist and the Old School Scholars", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know!%3F&oldid=1139210194, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, That the universe is best seen as constructed from thoughts and ideas rather than from. Fred Allen Wolf Here's an edited transcript: Cosmic Log: Every once in a while, you'll hear about something like "The Secret," or some other reference to quantum mechanics as explaining how you can change your universe, or even perhaps why it's in the realm of possibility that a globe-gobbling black hole could be created because "anything can happen" in quantum mechanics. If I didnt know any better, I would have thought it was something straight out of a Cheech and Chong movie. Certainly, our attitudes and brain chemistry affect how we see the world and get through life. He is also the theologian in residence of RSE. There's also much to be said for the idea that divine is not so much a separate entity but is found in the interconnectedness of the universe, something both traditional religious believers and "spiritual but not" people often agree on, though semantics can get in the way. They want suggestions, not formulas. "The movie is saying that somehow we can all get together and, with our collective thought processes, we can influence the outcome" of physical events - be they life experiences or scientific. By clicking 'Send to a friend' you agree ABC Online is not responsible for the content contained in your email message. The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too. Scientists in the physical realm also hypothesize that matter is solid (Wilson 5). These photos may well be art they're sure as hell not science. !" is a radical departure from convention. To some extent it could be, because memories and thoughts are stored at the molecular level, and at a molecular level quantum mechanics is significant. Given a few contextual clues, like whether the eyelids are open or shut, it can work out whether it's seeing something or remembering it. or call us at 1-617-450-2300. One of the scientists interviewed is John Hagelin who, besides being part of the TM cult surrounding Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, presidential candidate of the Natural Law Party, and Minister of Science and Technology of the Global Country of World Peace is a rather prominent particle theorist. Blech. Filename F:\torrent\What the Bleep Do We Know_2CD\disc one\09 What the Bleep.wav Peak level 100.0 % Extraction speed 8.6 X Track quality 100.0 % Test CRC 2A67087E Copy CRC 2A67087E Accurately ripped (confidence 4) [55AC2A89] (AR v1) Copy OK Track 10 Filename F:\torrent\What the Bleep Do We Know_2CD\disc one\10 Circle the Sun.wav Peak level 100.0 % You can't change the world by thinking about it. We all know most parts of the ocean are still undiscovered but there's plenty of theories. Its true that Hagelin stopped doing physics in the mid-nineties to concentrate on his other nonsense, but I can vouch for the fact that as early as 1978-9 he was heavily involved in TM and thought it had a lot to do with QFT. (Physicists should take part of the blame for this confusion. It's actually the machine that's the observer, not the human who's jotting down results. This website uses cookies to Some argue that the same quantum processes seen in the universe around us have an effect on consciousness as well, but physicist Lawrence Krauss says that's highly debatable. extended versions of What the BLEEP Do We Know! All those things can be attributed to quantum mechanics first of all, because it's so poorly understood by the public, and especially because it's so verifiably weird. Whether or not you buy into its "you are God in the making" philosophy, "What the Bleep Do We Know?" [9] In his review, Dave Kehr of The New York Times described the "transition from quantum mechanics to cognitive therapy" as "plausible", but stated also that "the subsequent leapfrom cognitive therapy into large, hazy spiritual beliefsisn't as effectively executed. "[15], Bernie Hobbs, a science writer with ABC Science Online, explains why the film is incorrect about quantum physics and reality: "The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. Around 650 million people watched the moment on television. "The protagonist, Amanda, played by Academy Award-Winning actress Marlee Matlin, finds herself in a fantastic Alice in Wonderland experience when her daily, uninspired life literally begins to unravel, revealing the uncertain world of the quantum field hidden behind what we consider to be our normal, waking reality. "Your mind can't tell the difference between what it sees and what it remembers" Dr Joseph Dispenza (Chiropractor ) in What the Bleep Do We Know? There's nothing wrong with that. Filmed to promote a new age philosophy based on a very, very broad interpretation of quantum physics, the movie was funded by J. One has already been recognized: If we do carefully prepare quantum systems, and keep them isolated, we can perform quantum magic technologically potentially on scales that we haven't been able to do before. Free delivery for many products. It went on to say that "Most laypeople cannot tell where the quantum physics ends and the quantum nonsense begins, and many are susceptible to being misguided," and that "a physics student may be unable to convincingly confront unjustified extrapolations of quantum mechanics," a shortcoming which the authors attribute to the current teaching of quantum mechanics, in which "we tacitly deny the mysteries physics has encountered". Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Hidden Dimensions, Pingback: Rachels Musings Rabbit Holes and Other Oddities, Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Philosophy of Science on Blogginheads.tv, Pingback: For "The Baby Goes Out With The Bathwater" Crowd - SLUniverse Forums. Having watched this travesty of a movie, any real scientist worth his quarks might be gun-shy about joining the debate. During the resulting chat, two men carrying a wooden door passed between the stranger and the subjects. That's not always true, but it's often true. 8. In the movie What the Bleep Do We Know?, physicists, biologists and the occasional chiropractor tell us how quantum physics and neuroscience support their views on consciousness. Though not marketed as such, those who have seen it note that it degenerates into an extended infomercial for channeler J. With researchers and theoretical scientists leading the way, it takes the reader through the looking glass of quantum physics into a universe that is more bizarre and alive than ever imagined. Some movies are so bad, they're funny. Human everyday life consists of many routines and necessary things that are mostly physical such as work, school, a number of chores or minor responsibilities, and hopefully sleep. In a corrupt, greed-fueled world, a powerful alchemist leads a Christ-like character and seven materialistic figures to the Holy Mountain,. A: Absolutely. So thanks to Associate Professor Zdenka Kuncik, Professor Peter Schofield and Professor Max Coltheart for shedding some light on the Bleeping thing. A: Quantum mechanics is often quoted as the explanation for many things, because it's so weird that people latch onto it as a hope, to explain everything that they would like to believe about the universe. The following persons in the film have all spoken at RSE and sold books there. But this only applies to sub-atomic particles a rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. Even though there's lots of proof that the Moon landing happened, some people don't . And while I dont think supersymmetric GUTs are anywhere near as promising as many people seem to think, they are a much saner idea than many that dominate research these days (take the Landscape, please). In the film, during a discussion of the influence of experience on perception, Candace Pert notes a story, which she says she believes is true, of Native Americans being unable to see Columbus's ships because they were outside their experience. [1], In mid-2005, the filmmakers worked with HCI Books to expand on the film's themes in a book titled What the Bleep Do We Know! Regular indicators of violent crime told a different story the number of murders actually went up. Use this form to email 'What the bleep are they on about?' Isnt that a bit like attacking algebra because of Serge Langs nutty ideas about HIV and AIDS? Adapted from "Ask the Everyday Scientist" with permission of the writer. After a successful DVD launch in March of 2005, Fox . But when animated, jive-talkin' human cells start dancing around in what appears to be the heroine's frontal lobe, all questions of spirituality pale before the sheer dreadfulness of this movie. As one of the film's characters gushes early in the proceedings, 'The moment we acknowledge the quantum self, we say that somebody has become enlightened'. A scientist debunks the claim that water reacts to human emotions. But what quantum mechanics doesn't change about the universe is, if you want to change things, you still have to do something. The movie features other proclaimed scientists who . In reality, science is completely incidental to the film's conclusions. [an error occurred while processing this directive]. The question is, how far down the rabbit hole, do you wanna go? Amit Gotswami "We only see what we believe is possible Native American Indians on Caribbean Islands couldn't see Columbus's ships [sitting on the horizon] because they were beyond their knowledge" Dr. Candace Pert (former scientist, current new-age guru) in What the Bleep Do We Know? "What the Bleep Do We Know," a pseudoscientific docudrama that purports to link quantum mechanics and consciousness, would be a riot if people didn't take it so seriously. But we behave like classical objects for a reason: We're big, we have lots of particles, they interact. Directors William Arntz, Betsy Chasse Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie Genres Details in the video itself.EXTENDED REFERENCES:Revelation:[a] Michael Freze, 1993, Voices, Visions, and Apparitions, OSV Publishing ISBN 087973454X page 252[b] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith[c] http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=confidence[d] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/faith[e] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faith[f] Dictionary.com. Seven Times Planet TV Studios Went Way Too Far: ReportWire.org info@planettvstudios.com nicholas@planettvstudios.com Eric@planettvstudios.com Julie@planettvstudios.com Website YouTube Channel Facebook Twitter Instagram Planet TV Studios LHTV LLC Has this experiment been replicated or verified? - Dr. Monitor journalism changes lives because we open that too-small box that most people think they live in. - - logged you out. is a book of amazing science, and now the international bestselling book is available in paperback. They are relevant because of the deliberateness on the part of the film makers to keep certain facts unknown (ironically, it is I making the unknown know) and misrepresent others. We use it to assign probabilities to possible measurement outcomes on the basis of actual measurement outcomes. Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. By continuing to browse the site I mean listen, you have very reputable individuals who believe in validation, as experimental proof. Thanks to Pylon Sentinel for pointing this out.A link to his Wikipedia page is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fred_Alan_Wolf Supported by groups like the Templeton Foundation, legitimateor more creative scientists are exploring the mind-body connection, or the similarities between particle-and-wave physics and certain religious concepts like the Trinity. The bits and pieces of matter that make up sub-atomic particles (protons, neutrons and electrons) don't exist in any handy, measurable way unless they're interacting with one another. [3], Work was split between Toronto-based Mr. X Inc., Lost Boys Studios in Vancouver, and Atomic Visual Effects in Cape Town, South Africa. 34 talking about this. Q: Why do you think that people have seized upon this? 3. [5] Foreign gross added another $5 million for a worldwide gross of nearly $16 million. Otherwise, the process falls "outside the realm of physical statements and has entered the realm of spiritual belief.". It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus.